Some would & some would not.
The “would not”s are most likely a bit more psychologically grounded and happy in life.
Here’s the deal — dopamine/testosterone/adrenaline feel good; humans like to feel good; getting a sexual arousal produces these hormones; humans often move toward feeling good unconsciously & automatically; in fact the neuron’s that mediate this behavior are much faster (more automatic) than those that mediate conscious & willful acts. That means you don’t have the opportunity to intervene or stop them until after they are in motion.
If you walk thru this life letting other people’s biological impulses & acts govern your sense of worth, value, respect or beauty, then you are a bit of a masochist. Or at least, you are holding onto some patterns of interpretation that are very likely to cause you distress & unnecessary suffering.
Edit: NOTICE that this post has 6.1k views, 4 upvotes and ZERO comments. Not a single person disputing anything I have said, and yet 4/6100 showing appreciation for the truth.
This is an example of (the nearly universal pattern of) people declining to engage with processes and perspectives that would force THEM to TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for their subjective (what the Buddhist’s called “unnecessary”) suffering. I call this strong automatic and unconscious drive, the push for: Homeostasis preservation!
Articles about the drive for Homeostasis preservation